Our firm represented Zero Waste in an appeal to the Supreme Court regarding a ruling in which the court rejected an administrative petition filed against the winning of Zero Waste in a tender for the construction, operation and maintenance of a waste treatment facility in Shafdan (Sewage treatment plant of the Dan region).
In the Supreme Court’s ruling, the issue of substantial changes made to the terms of a contract that was entered into following a tender was decided on for the first time.
It was determined that in the appropriate cases , a late change of terms may be permitted, and consideration such as changing circumstances or the time elapsed since entering into the contract should be taken into account.
The appeal was dismissed in its entirety, and the appellant was ordered to pay Zero Waste’s expenses.
Zero Waste was represented by Partner Noam Ronen together with Senior Associate Daniel Barlev.
